The Shocking Truth: Why Companies Spend 93% on AI Tech and Only 7% on People—and Fail

Companies spend 93% on AI technology and only 7% on people because organizations prioritize tools over training, change management, and adoption. This imbalance causes AI transformation failure, as employees lack the skills, trust, and workflows needed to turn AI investments into measurable business value.

KumDi.com

Companies spend 93% on AI Tech and only 7% on people, a critical mistake that explains why most AI transformation initiatives fail. Despite massive investment in platforms and infrastructure, organizations neglect employee training, change management, and AI adoption—preventing technology from delivering sustainable productivity, ROI, or competitive advantage.

Artificial intelligence is no longer experimental. It is now a board-level priority, a trillion-dollar global investment race, and a defining force behind competitive advantage. Yet behind the headlines about massive AI spending lies a deeply troubling statistic that explains why so many AI initiatives fail to deliver real value:

Companies spend approximately 93% of their AI transformation budgets on technology — and only 7% on people.

This imbalance is not just a budgeting issue. It is the single biggest structural reason why AI transformation underperforms, stalls, or collapses entirely.

In this article, we explore:

• What the 93% vs. 7% statistic actually means
• Why organizations keep repeating the same mistake
• How this imbalance undermines ROI, adoption, and trust
• What successful AI-driven companies do differently
• How leaders can rebalance AI investment for sustainable growth

Understanding the 93% vs. 7% AI Spending Gap

What counts as “technology” spending?

The 93% figure typically includes:

• AI platforms and software licenses
• Cloud infrastructure and compute power
• Data pipelines and storage
• Algorithms, models, and automation tools
• Systems integration and vendor contracts

These investments are visible, measurable, and easy to justify in procurement and financial reporting.

What counts as “people” spending?

The neglected 7% covers:

• Employee training and upskilling
• Change management programs
• Workflow redesign
• Leadership education
• Ethics, governance, and trust frameworks
• Communication and adoption support

Ironically, these are the very elements that determine whether AI is actually used — or quietly abandoned.

Why Companies Overinvest in AI Technology and Underinvest in People

1. Technology feels safer than change

Buying technology is familiar. Training people, changing workflows, and reshaping culture is uncomfortable.

Executives can approve multimillion-dollar AI platforms in a single meeting — but real transformation requires:

• Challenging power structures
• Redefining roles
• Addressing fear of job displacement
• Managing resistance

As a result, leaders often default to technology purchases instead of organizational change.

2. The myth: “If we build it, they will use it”

One of the most persistent myths in digital transformation is the belief that deployment equals adoption.

In reality:

• AI tools without training sit unused
• Dashboards without context are ignored
• Automation without trust is resisted

AI does not fail because it cannot perform — it fails because humans are not prepared to integrate it into daily work.

3. CFO logic unintentionally reinforces the imbalance

Technology spending is:

• Capitalizable
• Vendor-driven
• Easier to benchmark

People investment is:

• Ongoing
• Difficult to quantify
• Harder to tie directly to ROI

As a result, organizations optimize for financial optics instead of transformation outcomes.

The Real Cost of Spending 93% on Tech and 7% on People

1. AI projects fail to scale

Many organizations report that AI initiatives:

• Succeed in pilots
• Stall in production
• Never scale enterprise-wide

The reason is rarely technical. Scaling fails because:

• Employees do not trust the system
• Processes were never redesigned
• Incentives remain unchanged

2. ROI remains elusive

Despite massive AI spending:

• Many companies see minimal financial impact
• Productivity gains fall short of projections
• Business units quietly revert to old methods

Without people investment, AI becomes an expense rather than a multiplier.

3. Employee resistance and fear increase

When AI is introduced without proper communication and reskilling:

• Employees fear replacement
• Managers resist transparency
• Teams sabotage adoption — consciously or unconsciously

Ironically, organizations then respond by buying more technology, deepening the cycle.

AI Transformation Is 80% Human, 20% Technical

Decades of transformation research reveal a consistent pattern:

Most transformation failures are human and organizational — not technical.

KumDi.com

AI magnifies this reality because it:

• Changes how decisions are made
• Alters power dynamics
• Challenges professional identity
• Redefines what “expertise” means

Spending 93% on tools and 7% on people is like buying a fleet of airplanes and refusing to train pilots.

What AI-Leading Companies Do Differently

Organizations that consistently generate value from AI invert the traditional spending logic.

1. They invest heavily in AI literacy

AI-mature companies ensure:

• Every employee understands what AI can and cannot do
• Leaders know how to ask the right questions
• Teams learn how to collaborate with AI systems

AI literacy becomes a core business skill, not a niche technical capability.

2. They redesign workflows before deploying AI

Instead of adding AI on top of existing processes, they ask:

• Where should humans lead?
• Where should AI assist?
• Where should AI automate?

This prevents friction and maximizes productivity.

3. They measure adoption, not deployment

Success metrics shift from:

• “How many tools did we buy?”
  to
• “How often is AI used in decision-making?”
• “Did it improve speed, quality, or outcomes?”

Usage, trust, and impact become KPIs.

4. They align incentives with AI adoption

High-performing companies:

• Tie executive bonuses to adoption metrics
• Reward teams that integrate AI effectively
• Promote leaders who embrace data-driven decision-making

Behavior follows incentives — not software.

Rethinking the AI Investment Model

A healthier AI spending balance

While exact ratios vary by industry, many experts argue that effective AI transformation looks closer to:

• 60–70% technology
• 30–40% people, process, and governance

This includes:

• Continuous training
• Change leadership
• Ethical frameworks
• Trust and transparency systems

The Strategic Risk of Ignoring People in AI

Organizations that continue to prioritize technology over people face long-term risks:

• Competitive disadvantage
• Talent attrition
• Cultural stagnation
• Regulatory exposure
• Public trust erosion

AI success is no longer about who buys the most tools — it’s about who builds the most capable human-AI organizations.

Final Thoughts: AI Transformation Is Not a Tech Project

The 93% vs. 7% statistic is not just shocking — it is revealing.

It exposes a fundamental misunderstanding:

AI transformation is not a technology project. It is a human transformation powered by technology.

KumDi.com

Companies that continue to treat AI as an IT initiative will continue to struggle. Those that rebalance investment toward people, skills, trust, and change will define the next era of economic leadership.

In the age of AI, the true competitive advantage is not the algorithm — it is the organization that knows how to use it.

FAQs