The annual gathering of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Kazakhstan has once again become a stage for the deepening alliance between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. As the two authoritarian leaders seek to counter the influence of the United States and its Western allies, their meeting on the sidelines of the SCO summit serves as a powerful display of their commitment to forging a “multipolar world order.”
In the midst of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the SCO summit provides Putin a valuable opportunity to demonstrate that Russia remains connected to the international community, despite the West’s attempts to isolate the Kremlin through punishing sanctions. Likewise, Xi can leverage the platform to bolster China’s global standing and present an alternative to the U.S.-led liberal democratic model. The presence of other world leaders, including Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and UN Secretary-General António Guterres, further underscores the geopolitical significance of this gathering.
As the leaders of the SCO member states convene in Astana, the spotlight will be on the high-profile meeting between Putin and Xi, who have already met nearly 40 times over the course of their tenures. Their discussions are expected to delve into a wide range of issues, from strengthening economic and security cooperation to coordinating their responses to the West’s pressure. The outcome of this summit could have far-reaching implications for the global balance of power and the future of international relations.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Counterweight to Western Dominance
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) was established in 2001 by China and Russia, with the primary goal of addressing security concerns in Central Asia and promoting a more “multipolar” world order. Over the years, the organization has expanded its membership to include India, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, making it a significant player in the region.
One of the key drivers behind the SCO’s creation was the desire to counter Western influence and the perceived dominance of the United States and its allies. The organization’s member states have often expressed their dissatisfaction with the U.S.-led global order, which they view as unfairly tilted in favor of Western interests. By banding together, the SCO nations aim to assert their own political and economic autonomy, and to challenge the hegemony of the West.
Putin’s Diplomatic Offensive at the SCO Summit
For Russian President Vladimir Putin, the SCO summit represents a crucial opportunity to demonstrate that his country is not isolated on the global stage, despite the Western sanctions and international condemnation over the invasion of Ukraine. By engaging with other world leaders, Putin can project an image of Russia as a key player in the international arena, capable of maintaining strategic partnerships and influencing regional dynamics.
One of Putin’s primary objectives at the SCO summit is to solidify his alliance with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The two leaders have already met on numerous occasions, most recently in May, when Putin visited Beijing to underscore the depth of their partnership. At the SCO gathering, Putin and Xi are expected to reaffirm their commitment to a “no-limits” partnership, which has become a cornerstone of their geopolitical strategy.
China’s Pursuit of Global Influence through the SCO
For Chinese President Xi Jinping, the SCO summit represents a valuable platform to further enhance China’s global influence and present an alternative to the U.S.-led international order. As the world’s second-largest economy and a rapidly growing military power, China has been increasingly assertive in its efforts to shape the global landscape in a way that aligns with its own interests.
Through the SCO, China can project its influence across Central Asia and the broader “Global South,” a term that refers to developing nations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. By strengthening economic and political ties with these countries, China aims to create a network of allies that can counterbalance the dominance of the West, led by the United States.
Moreover, the SCO serves as a venue for China to showcase its vision of a “multipolar world,” where power is distributed more evenly among various centers of influence, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few Western nations. This narrative resonates with many of the SCO member states, which have long felt marginalized by the perceived hegemony of the U.S. and its allies.
The Delicate Balancing Act of Central Asian Nations
For the Central Asian nations that are members of the SCO, the summit represents a complex diplomatic challenge. These countries, which include Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, find themselves navigating a delicate balance between their larger neighbors, Russia and China, while also maintaining ties with the West.
On the one hand, the Central Asian states have deep historical and cultural connections with Russia, and they are heavily dependent on the Kremlin’s economic and security support. At the same time, they are wary of becoming too reliant on Moscow, especially in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has raised concerns about the potential for further regional instability.
On the other hand, China’s economic influence in Central Asia has been steadily growing, with massive infrastructure projects and investment initiatives that have strengthened Beijing’s foothold in the region. The Central Asian nations are eager to capitalize on China’s economic might, but they are also mindful of the need to maintain a certain degree of independence from both Russia and China.
As a result, the Central Asian SCO members have adopted a pragmatic approach, seeking to cultivate relationships with a diverse range of partners, including the United States and European Union, in addition to their larger neighbors. This delicate balancing act is likely to be a key theme of the Astana summit, as the leaders of these nations navigate the complex geopolitical landscape.
India’s Tightrope Walk between Russia and the West
Another notable participant in the SCO summit is India, which has historically maintained close ties with Russia while also strengthening its strategic partnerships with the United States and its Western allies. This geopolitical tightrope walk has become increasingly challenging in the wake of the Ukraine conflict, as India has sought to maintain a neutral stance and avoid openly condemning Russia’s actions.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decision to skip the SCO summit, opting instead to send his foreign minister, has sparked speculation that India is seeking to balance its relationships more carefully. By not attending the high-profile gathering, Modi may be signaling a desire to distance himself from the optics of the Putin-Xi alliance, while still preserving India’s long-standing ties with Russia.
India’s position is further complicated by its own regional rivalries, particularly with Pakistan, which is also a member of the SCO. The two South Asian neighbors have long been at odds over the disputed territory of Kashmir, and their presence at the same summit raises the potential for diplomatic tensions and jockeying for influence.
The Presence of Other Key Players
The SCO summit is not just a gathering of the organization’s member states; it also features the participation of several other influential players, each with their own strategic interests and agendas.
One of the most notable attendees is Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose country holds a “partner status” with the SCO. Erdogan has sought to position Turkey as a mediator between Russia and Ukraine, and his presence at the summit suggests that he may seek to use the platform to advance his diplomatic efforts.
Additionally, UN Secretary-General António Guterres will be in attendance, underscoring the global significance of the SCO gathering. Guterres is likely to use the opportunity to engage with various world leaders, including Putin, in an effort to address pressing international issues, such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and its broader implications for global stability.
The presence of these outside actors, along with the SCO member states, further highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics at play and the potential for the summit to serve as a stage for high-level diplomatic maneuvering.
The Implications of the SCO Summit for Global Security
As the leaders of the SCO member states convene in Astana, the summit’s outcomes will have significant implications for global security and the balance of power on the international stage. The strengthening of the Putin-Xi alliance, in particular, could have far-reaching consequences for the future of international relations.
One of the primary concerns is the potential for the SCO to serve as a counterweight to the influence of the United States and its Western allies. By bolstering their strategic partnership, Putin and Xi may be able to create a more multipolar world order, where power is distributed more evenly among various centers of influence.
This shift could have profound implications for the global security landscape, potentially undermining the dominance of the U.S.-led liberal democratic model and creating new challenges for Western policymakers. Furthermore, the SCO’s focus on security cooperation and the fight against terrorism could also have an impact on regional stability, particularly in Central Asia and the broader Eurasian region.
Economic and Trade Cooperation within the SCO
In addition to its geopolitical significance, the SCO summit also serves as a platform for the member states to discuss and coordinate their economic and trade policies. As the global economy continues to grapple with the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and China, the SCO provides an opportunity for its members to explore new avenues for collaboration and mutual prosperity.
One of the key areas of focus is likely to be the development of regional infrastructure projects, such as the China-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This ambitious program aims to connect Asia, Europe, and Africa through a vast network of roads, railways, and maritime routes, and it has been a central component of China’s economic and geopolitical strategy.
The SCO member states, particularly the Central Asian nations, have been active participants in the BRI, and the summit may provide a chance for them to further coordinate their efforts and address any challenges or concerns that have arisen. Additionally, the leaders may discuss ways to enhance trade and investment ties within the SCO framework, potentially exploring the creation of new economic partnerships and initiatives.
Counterterrorism and Regional Security Cooperation
Another critical aspect of the SCO summit is the organization’s focus on counterterrorism and regional security cooperation. As a group of nations that have faced various security threats, from separatist movements to religious extremism, the SCO has made it a priority to coordinate its efforts in addressing these challenges.
One of the key areas of cooperation is the sharing of intelligence and the development of joint security operations. The SCO member states have established a Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS), which serves as a platform for coordinating their counterterrorism efforts and responding to emerging threats.
During the summit, the leaders are likely to discuss the evolving security landscape in Central Asia and the broader Eurasian region, and explore ways to strengthen their collective response to transnational threats. This could include discussions on issues such as border security, the repatriation of foreign fighters, and the prevention of the spread of extremist ideologies.
The Role of the United Nations and the Potential for Dialogue on Ukraine
Despite the SCO’s focus on countering Western influence, the summit will also feature the participation of a key international actor: the United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres. Guterres’ presence at the gathering underscores the global significance of the event and the potential for dialogue on pressing international issues, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
While the SCO member states have largely refrained from directly condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the summit may provide an opportunity for Guterres to engage with the various leaders, including Putin, in an effort to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis. The UN chief may use the platform to advocate for a ceasefire, the resumption of peace talks, and the mitigation of the humanitarian consequences of the war.
Moreover, the SCO summit could serve as a rare occasion for Guterres to have direct conversations with Putin, as the Russian leader’s travel has been limited due to the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant against him. These discussions could be crucial in maintaining open channels of communication and exploring potential pathways for resolving the conflict in Ukraine.
The Evolving Geopolitical Landscape and the Future of the SCO
As the Shanghai Cooperation Organization continues to evolve and expand its influence, the Astana summit will provide a crucial glimpse into the organization’s long-term trajectory and its role in shaping the global geopolitical landscape.
One of the key questions that will likely be addressed is the potential for the SCO to deepen its institutional cooperation and become a more cohesive and influential bloc on the international stage. While the organization has grown in size and scope over the years, it has often been criticized for its lack of tangible achievements and its inability to translate its rhetorical commitments into concrete policy outcomes.
The strengthening of the Putin-Xi alliance, as well as the potential admission of Belarus as a full member, could signal a renewed push by the SCO to assert its relevance and challenge the dominance of the West. However, the organization will also need to navigate the complex web of regional rivalries and divergent interests among its member states, which could pose significant obstacles to its ambitions.
Ultimately, the outcome of the Astana summit and the future trajectory of the SCO will have far-reaching implications for the global balance of power, the dynamics of international cooperation, and the ongoing struggle for influence in the Eurasian region and beyond.
Conclusion: The Significance of the SCO Summit in the Evolving Global Order
The upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Astana, Kazakhstan, is poised to be a pivotal event in the ongoing geopolitical tug-of-war between the West and the emerging alliance of Russia and China. As the leaders of the SCO member states convene, the spotlight will be firmly fixed on the high-profile meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, whose deepening partnership represents a direct challenge to the U.S.-led liberal democratic order.
Through the SCO platform, Putin and Xi will seek to demonstrate their commitment to forging a “multipolar world,” where power is more evenly distributed among various centers of influence. This vision stands in stark contrast to the Western-dominated global system that has prevailed in the post-Cold War era, and the SCO summit provides a valuable opportunity for the two authoritarian leaders to rally support from other nations that have long felt marginalized by the perceived hegemony of the United States and its allies.
However, the summit’s significance extends far beyond the Putin-Xi dynamic. The participation of other key players, such as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and UN Secretary-General António Guterres, underscores the global implications of the SCO’s activities and the potential for this gathering to shape the trajectory of international relations in the years to come.
As the world watches the unfolding events in Astana, the outcome of the SCO summit will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for global security, economic cooperation, and the overall balance of power on the international stage. The decisions made and the alliances forged during this gathering will be critical in determining the shape of the emerging multipolar world order and the future of geopolitical competition between the West and its challengers.
and then 