The year 2024 is projected to be a pivotal one, marked by a multitude of global risks and geopolitical challenges. As we examine the top 10 global risks for the upcoming year, it becomes evident that the post-World War II global system is unraveling, giving rise to a complex array of interlinked events and developments. Amidst this disorder and strife, signs of distress are likely to surface, leading to potential consequences for economies, politics, and international relations.
- 1. Africa’s Second Lost Decade
- 2. Trump 2.0: Upending the United States’ “Internationalist” Role
- 3. Stalemate Without a Ukrainian Breakthrough Next Year
- 4. The Ongoing Israel-Palestine Conflict
- 5. A Global Gap on Climate Change
- 6. An Expanding Conflict in the Middle East that Fuels Further Inflation
- 7. De-risking Global Supply Chains
- 8. Countries Race to Innovate on and Regulate AI
- 9. Oceans Take Geostrategic Prominence
- 10. Elections Everywhere All at Once
- Conclusion
1. Africa’s Second Lost Decade
Africa stands at the intersection of numerous disruptive global trends, creating a challenging landscape for the continent. With a persistent debt crisis, diminishing capital flows, climate change impacts, and widespread conflict, Africa is facing endemic challenges. The region’s demographic bounty, with a projected one billion people in their prime working-age years by 2050, could become a liability without significant economic growth and job opportunities. However, the path to recovery is hindered by escalating debt levels, reaching a staggering $656 billion, and an urgent need for debt relief initiatives.
To achieve a new development trajectory, Africa requires increased support from OECD nations and a qualitative ramp-up of G-20 efforts in the Common Framework. This includes diversifying trade with Asia to create new economic opportunities and bridging the gap between industrialized and developing nations. However, conflict, climate change, and a less favorable global environment pose significant challenges to Africa’s economic recovery and development.
2. Trump 2.0: Upending the United States’ “Internationalist” Role
The potential reelection of former President Donald Trump in 2024 could have far-reaching implications for the United States and the global order. With a strong focus on revenge, a second term for Trump would likely disrupt U.S. democracy and further destabilize the world system. Domestically, Trump’s authoritarian ambitions have grown even more ambitious, while internationally, he aims to pursue an “anti-globalist” agenda. This could include revoking U.S. climate pledges, scrapping key policies, and reshaping international relationships.
Under a Trump presidency, the United States may end aid to Ukraine, renew ties with Russia, and engage in negotiations on Ukraine without involving Kyiv. Furthermore, Trump’s approach to international trade, including the imposition of tariffs and a potential reduction of U.S. commitments to NATO, could further strain global relations. While the outcome of the 2024 election remains uncertain, the potential for a Trump 2.0 presidency introduces significant geopolitical risks.
3. Stalemate Without a Ukrainian Breakthrough Next Year
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine continues to be a source of geopolitical tension and uncertainty. Despite initial hopes for a successful counteroffensive, 2023 witnessed a stalemate with minimal territorial gains or losses. While Ukraine has made some progress in breaking Russia’s Black Sea blockade and launching attacks on Crimea and Russian soil, Putin’s war economy has expanded military production. The absence of a breakthrough and waning support from the United States and the European Union pose challenges for Ukraine’s future.
The year 2024 holds the potential for greater Ukrainian successes, which could raise questions about Russia’s military sustainability. Meanwhile, Western pressure on Kyiv for cease-fire talks may intensify if Ukrainian progress remains limited. The outcome of the conflict is uncertain, with potential implications for U.S.-Russia relations and the broader geopolitical landscape. Putin’s strategy may involve intensified drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, infrastructure, and ports, aiming to destabilize Ukraine as a functioning nation-state.
4. The Ongoing Israel-Palestine Conflict
The unresolved Israel-Palestine conflict continues to pose significant geopolitical risks in 2024. While the Israel Defense Forces may have diminished Hamas’s military capabilities, the destruction of housing and infrastructure leaves many Palestinians homeless and creates fertile ground for recruitment by Hamas or other extremist groups. Arab states may be hesitant to overtly partner with the United States as they demand a demonstrated Israeli commitment to a two-state solution, which has proven elusive over the past five decades.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s political future remains uncertain, with polls indicating that most Israelis blame him for the war and desire his resignation. However, a strengthened conservative movement in Israel may continue to impede progress towards a two-state solution. The ongoing anger and grief on both sides of the conflict increase the risk of further violence, including settler violence against Palestinians or attacks by Iranian proxies. The Israel-Palestine conflict remains a tinderbox that could have broader regional implications.
5. A Global Gap on Climate Change
The urgency of addressing climate change becomes increasingly evident as global temperatures rise and the world faces a significant gap in efforts to mitigate its effects. Current projections suggest a temperature increase of 2.9 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, with temperatures already having risen by 1.1 degrees Celsius. Achieving the desired limit of a 1.5-degree increase is becoming increasingly unlikely, even if countries meet their climate goals.
Inequalities persist in addressing climate change, with the richest 10% of the world’s population contributing nearly half of emissions, while the poorest 50% account for only 12% of total emissions. The promise of $100 billion per year for climate adaptation in poorer nations, made by rich countries in 2009, remains unfulfilled. The global south demands greater fairness in climate action, leading to the establishment of a “loss-and-damage” fund at the COP28 summit. However, significant gaps in financing and mitigation efforts persist, requiring urgent attention and international collaboration.
6. An Expanding Conflict in the Middle East that Fuels Further Inflation
The Middle East is a region riddled with conflicts that have the potential to exacerbate inflation and economic instability. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Gulf, create risks that could disrupt global supply chains and impact the cost of goods. The region’s strategic importance as a key transit route for global goods trade and its role in energy production make it a critical factor in global economic stability.
To mitigate these risks, governments and businesses are increasingly focused on de-risking global supply chains. The COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine exposed vulnerabilities in global dependencies and the challenges of just-in-time and globalized supply chains. Governments are now reevaluating their reliance on industrial policies to promote domestic production of critical products. Geopolitical competition is closely intertwined with these industrial policies, further shaping the global economic landscape.
7. De-risking Global Supply Chains
The need to de-risk global supply chains has become a pressing concern in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions. The concentration of production in a limited number of markets has revealed vulnerabilities and the importance of achieving resilience. Governments are now reengaging in or expanding their reliance on industrial policies to promote domestic production of critical goods.
As geopolitical competition intersects with industrial policies, the explicit connection between economic policy and foreign or national security policies becomes more apparent. In 2024, countries will prioritize reducing global dependencies and ensuring national security over purely economic considerations. This shift in focus will impact supply chain strategies and necessitate a reevaluation of sustainability measures.
8. Countries Race to Innovate on and Regulate AI
The geopolitics of artificial intelligence (AI) will continue to gain prominence in 2024 as governments race to regulate AI and foster domestic innovation. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the potential sociopolitical risks associated with AI and seek to minimize them through regulatory frameworks. Simultaneously, countries aim to cultivate their own AI capabilities to remain competitive on the global stage.
The competition between the United States and China in the field of AI will be a central dynamic in 2024. Both countries will strive to balance regulation with innovation, ensuring that they harness the benefits of AI while mitigating potential risks. This dual race towards AI innovation and regulation will contribute to the formation of distinct geopolitical blocs and shape future international relations.
9. Oceans Take Geostrategic Prominence
The geostrategic importance of the oceans will feature prominently in 2024, driven by their ecological, economic, and national security significance. The oceans support 94% of all life on Earth and play a crucial role in global trade, with 90% of goods transported via maritime routes. However, geopolitical disruption poses risks to these vital transit corridors.
Additionally, deep-sea mining is projected to become a significant source of critical minerals necessary for the energy transition. As companies consider their supply chain and sustainability strategies, they must account for the evolving geopolitical dynamics surrounding the oceans. Balancing economic interests, environmental concerns, and national security imperatives will be crucial in navigating this complex landscape.
10. Elections Everywhere All at Once
The year 2024 will be marked by a multitude of elections, creating a global elections supercycle. Voters in markets representing over half of the global population and nearly 60% of global GDP will head to the polls. This simultaneous wave of elections introduces regulatory and policy uncertainty, with potential consequences for international relationships and economic policies.
The outcomes of these elections, particularly in influential countries like the United States and the European Union, will shape the global business environment for years to come. Competing visions for international relationships and economic policies will have far-reaching implications, making these elections some of the most consequential in recent history.
Conclusion
As we delve into the top 10 global risks for 2024, it becomes clear that the geopolitical landscape is undergoing significant shifts and challenges. The unraveling of the post-World War II global system, combined with the interplay of various risks and uncertainties, creates a complex multiverse of alliances, rivalries, and institutional groupings. The year 2024 carries the potential for both geopolitical surprises and risks, as the world navigates through multipolarity and de-risking strategies.
While these risks present formidable challenges, they also present opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and adaptation. Governments, businesses, and individuals must remain vigilant, proactive, and adaptive to the evolving global landscape. By understanding and addressing these risks, we can strive towards a more resilient and sustainable future.
and then 